Well, I disagree with you about the Clintons, most definitely.

How are higher morals about who women choose to have sex with going to lead to less pregnancies, let alone unwanted pregnancies, if birth control is not available? How will women, who take the higher moral ground about who they have sex with, protect themselves from STDs without condoms and other means? How will they know that the men they have sex with, whom I notice you did not suggest take the higher moral ground, are safe from impregnating them and/or passing on a sexual disease?

Finally, saying we should all take responsibility, which birth control ALLOWS US TO DO, but NOT advocating against a government which is trying to take that responsibility away from us, is disingenuous at best, utterly naive and/or misogynistic at worst.