I didn't personally attack you DV. I simply pointed out that paranoid ravings from skeptics were not credible.

I did this in exactly the same way that you pointed out that people who support Obama and quoted his words were not credible.

There was no need for you to take it personally unless you believe that your words are such that others could mistake them for paranoid ravings.

On the other hand you strongly implied that the judgement of those who support Obama is not to be trusted because they are acting on emotion.

I did not take this as a personal attack. If you must know, I took it as irrational stereotyping and profound ignorance.

But perhaps you have another explanation. Perhaps you have mountains of evidence showing why one could not come to a rational decision to support Obama. If so, I'd really like to read it.