(Psst--LH...that's "hail", not "hale".)

DV:

WHen you said that Barack Obama would just be a continuation of Bush you not only kind of insulted folks who wouldn't pee on the Bush if it was burning on a mountainside, but you also made a serious error in logic, conflating things as the same which are very different. So I endeavoured to point out where those differences lie.

You then saw fit to reject the distinctions, saying they were not visible to you. Which means you are either dense or insensitive to the nature of individual character, or just generally bitter in some way you have not said. Or that my perceptiono f those differences is delusory, which is an interpretation I think is pretty improbable. If I am loony, I have lots of folks who agree with my strange perceptions! But I seriously don't think so.



Who's bullying?