The one from the blogger is not documentation. It's just more about what the blogger thinks is likely to happen. Of the three that he uses as supporting documentation, one is intended to support (I suppose) the idea that Iran has bioweapons. The other two are reports from other media (besides his blog) that he believes support what he has written in his blog. What this shows is that other media besides his blog are also saying essentially the same things he is. I don't think we ever see the kind of evidence in the media that is listed in the above post. The two supporting articles mention government sources. That's what all media do. They cite "government sources".

I don't think any of this is proof of anything. But the fact that The Middle East Times is reporting on it from the perspective of the government of Kuwait, I think gives it a lot more credibility than it would have if it was just coming from that one blogger.