Nobody said that motel owners had to provide porn. They were told that the "pay-per-view" supplier had to be allowed access to the motel customers. They could choose to use it (or not). Of course the motel gets a cut of the $$$ and with some motel chains that is all that keeps them from going broke. The owner in question said he had a right to run his business his way, financial consequences and all.

Still, is anyone going to say that the court's decision was wrong?