I reserve making judgements about right or wrong until presented with a bit of factual information. I endeavored to find said information using Google and had no success. Ball's in your court.

Having said that, I would be willing state that:

1) IF the motel owner originally contracted to provide pay-per-view porn to his guests and later changed his mind, he's wrong, the court's right.

2) IF the motel owner didn't realize he was signing a contract to provide pay-per-view porn, he's an idiot, the court's right.

3) IF the motel owner originally contracted to provide pay-per-view movies but NOT porn to his guests, and the pay-per-view people tried to tack the porn on after the fact, they're slimeballs, the court's wrong.

I don't know which, if any, of the above scenarios applies to the case. Hence, as stated above, ball's in your court.