B-dubs...no contract involved, just a "freedom of speech" issue in a suit by (ostensbly) civil rights types. They regarded the owner as a "reactionary" and someone who was being "judgemental" and therefore had to be taken down a peg. The contention was that the motel, like a shopping center, was open to the public, and that not allowing access to "pay-per-veiw" porn violated the freedom of speech.