There is also precisely zero evidence that the article I posted about Scheunemann is not true. Since the person who is calling that article and the discussion about it "consipracy theory" is the only one who is putting forth any kind of argument about it, that person is the only one who has to provide evidence in support of that argument.

No one else is making any argument about it, and so therefore, no one else needs to provide any evidence in support of arguments they are not making.

Duh!