Ok Don…. Here are my replies.. An eleven year sunspot cycle, though unproven will not cycle continuously and simultaneously and its strength will vary. The same is true with Milankovich cycles. You need to worry about the sun's intensity because it may have reached Gaia's tipping point. It is this tipping point that is of relevance: not the sun's intensity; per se.

Nasa receives your government's funding. Your Government has a two pronged attack plan for its people. It is to do with taxing you, peak oil production and the introduction of hydrogen based energy technology. I cannot go into more detail here because the truth I will write will cause this thread to be terminated. Censorship applied in the same way as your government censors you.

These agencies are, in fact, toeing your governments line.. Look deeper Mr. Firth.. Try thinking more about the prime directive of all or any government.

I note you have studied Geologic science. Then please answer the following questions because they are central to the warming debate...yet are never disclosed...

What is the relevance to climate of the Tibetan plateau?

Temperature led warming is shadowed by atmospheric gaseous flux; this is an example of positive feedback. Do you know the implied and resultant negative feed back mechanisms of Gaia?

Please tell me about delta oxygen 18 values and also about delta carbon 13 values over geologic time.

Please quote the accepted value of the Earths albedo and its link to Hadley cells with specific reference to a warming planet.


Why has your country not accepted the Kyoto Protocol?

Please explain your statement "humans to keep accelerating the process by continuously pouring greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere"… specifically what greenhouse gases are you talking about and which greenhouse gas is in the ascendance?