Please learn the difference between hard evidence and circumstantial evidence, and also the difference between an opinion and an argument.

As I have said repeatedly, since the one saying that the article I posted is not true is the only one who is making any kind of argument, that person is the only one who has to provide any proof. Since I only voiced an opinion about what is possible rather than an argument about what is necessarily true, I do not have to provide any proof whatever.

Since I have seen no proof, or even any evidence or any facts to support the argument that the article I posted is not true, I think we can safely say that the person who is demanding proof from me for an argument that I am not making is engaging in gross hypocrisy, is not willing to put up or shut up or to hold themself to the same standards they are holding others, and does not deserve to be taken the least bit seriously.

When this person behaves in the same manner they are nagging others to behave in, that's when I will consider taking that person seriously. I don't expect that to ever happen.