Still beating the dead horse, eh, Ron?

Everything in your post makes good sense until the last paragraph...where you try your usual cheap shot of trying to cast Rig as a "hypocrite" for supporting Palen and McCain (because Rig claims to be anti-religious).

I've already explained to you in great detail, Ron, that Rig's favoring Palen and McCain has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with his views on religion one way or another...it has to do with a host of other matters (primarily the fact that he can't stand Obama for some reason...I suppose because Obama took away his dream of seeing Hillary Clinton elected).

He could just as well oppose Obama for anti-religious reasons too, Ron. Remember Reverend Wright and all that BS? Obama is also overtly Christian.

Give it up. Stick to REAL stuff and you are on solid ground. Try to cast Rig as a "hypocrite" over this religion BS and you are not. ALL the candidates are overtly religious, as they MUST be if they are going to run for high office in the USA. The American public will not elect an openly declared atheist.

Rig IS an openly declared atheist...and there's nothing hypocritical about it. He hates religion with a pathological hatred which is, in my opinion, completely irrational, but it's not hypocritical. He HAS no officially atheist candidate out there whom he can vote for. Therefore he must either support a religious candidate or support no one at all.