False and defamatory!"
Tautologous and wrong, I'm afraid me old ocker. And we won't even start on the pleonasm.
I suggest you take a look at what defamation actually is. It's something false uttered or published to a third party which will tend to cause you loss in your trade or profession or cause a reasonable person to think worse of you.
As for 'false' - justification is a defence for defamation, matey. Look at the David Irvine case.
And as for the opinion of the man on the Clapham omnibus - you're doing a grand job at defaming yourself. With every successive post you come across as a blinkered, witless, naive and foolish individual prone to spouting the sort of drivel that the BNP and its ilk peddles softly to would-be sympathisers.