WAV. Re your post of 5.20 and my previous post of 4.50. I asked you to analyse your views on cultural segregation against the UN definition of racial discrimination and produce a clear argument about why I should not regard you as a racist. You claim to have answered this point. Where?
As things stand you are a racist, in that you advocate a different access to particular cultural activities and values, based solely on national origin. (The UN definition refers.) I am giving you repeated opportunities to either justify or modify your racist arguments, and so far you have not been able to come up with a single academically of morally valid point to do so. Insulting others, reducing the central point to nit-picking detail, repeating the drivel from your utterly discredited websites and re-hashing the meaningless arguments you have used so far do not count in this case. The UN definition has nailed you as the racist that you are, and you don't seem to have any answer worth the name. Perhaps it's time for you to go away for a while, take a break and reconsider your 'manifesto' in the light of evidence and truth, as opposed to just your own unsupported, academically bankrupt views?
Tim