Why is it dishonest to say that if you took Jim's argument to it's logical conclusion

It isn't at all, theleveller. But that is NOT what you said. You actualy said, and read it if you don't believe me,

Taking Jim Carroll's argument, we should ban all amateur productions

If you are now saying you actualy meant to include the 'logical conclusion' bit but somehow forgot, I am quite happy with that. We all make mistakes.

Cheers

DeG