Bobert

I have pointed out thet the Blix report of Jan 27 states that Saddam had NOT cooperated, and that future efforts would be useless as long as he did not. Simple fact: He ended on a positive note ( as is cusomary in political speeches) that IF he had cooperation he could see some future achievements- but he stated throughout his talk that he did NOT have that cooperation that was required for him to do his job.




michaelr

"Quote from bb: "it is the words and demonstrations of the Left against any action about Saddam that are the cause of the war"

That has to be one of the most egregious lies I've yet seen on the subject. You war apologists have blood on your hands same as Bush and his henchmen."


As for my opinion being a lie, I can state the same about those here who do have the blood on their hands, by their encouragement of Saddam to continue not complying with the UN. Opinion is that: You may disagree with it, but if you tell me that is NOT my opinion, you are being a true SFB. Those who are Saddam apologists have the blood, not those who support the UN resolutions.

Statement of opinion: If we had NOT invaded, there would be far more dead, from every indication that I have seen.

Feel free to argue FACTS, but jusyt because you do not like my opinion is not sufficient reason for it to be invalid.