I make a certain distinction in this ongoing argument. I dislike RUS because when I was exposed to it, it contained "cleaned up" lyrics, the wrong chords, and people who insisted that it was the bible of folk music. We, of course, know that the bible of folk music is the mind, and we sing songs the way our mind "hears" them and remembers them (Folk process?). Because of the way I phrase, which has to do with interpretation the way my mind "hears" the song, I sometimes have folks gently chastise me, or worse yet when they are listening to me they attempt to sing over me and superimpose "the correct way" onto my song. I am really not bothered by notes or crib sheets, as I have seen some pretty damned amazing singers use them at gatherings, and in live performance venues. What does bother me is when someone clearly has not invested the time to know the song, understand the context and message they are trying to portray, and we are all uncomfortable watching them stumble.

BUT ON THE OTHER HAND..........

There are those who, while lacking confidence and maybe with marginal skills, that just want to sing. The book gives them the ability, and they make the leap and overcome their fear, .......... and they sing. When I see someone who is clearly trying to stretch out and do this, I encourage them as much as possible.

And by the way, the two compilations of "Sing Out" (one is blue, the other is pink) are the real deal. I still have both, they are threadbare and worn, and they are a treasure. I do not possess a copy of RUS, but I suppose I shall pick up the current edition at some point.

Just my tuppence worth.....

All the best,

Mick