I started this thread to try to find out if there is evidence to support either the usual justification that it was for disguise, or whether it did in fact derive from the minstrels. I've never blacked up myself, although I used to dance Cotswold morris, but I'm still interested in morris and in our traditions generally.

From what I've seen the evidence is inconclusive (however I've not read the full EDS article Ruth quoted from, which is not on line). There are certainly references to disguise being an element, on the other hand it did resume at a time when minstrelsy was popular and when other elements of minstrelsy were adopted by morris. However the Nutters seem to pre-date the minstrels.

In the absence of firm evidence, there seem to be four possible views

1) That blacking up was a direct result of the minstrel craze and is therefore racist

2) That blacking up was already a custom, for purposes of disguise. The minstrel craze may have prompted a revival, but blacking up was not in imitation of the minstrels.

3) It doesn't matter what the origin was, blacking up for any purpose may now be seen as racist and we should avoid giving offence to anyone

4) It doesn't matter what the origin was, blacking up now is clearly not racist in intention and we should be robust in defending our traditions

I think these are all valid opinions. Personally, from the evidence I've seen I'm still comfortable with the view that it was mainly for disguise and the racist argument is a red herring, but I also understand why some hold different views, and I'll be willing to reconsider if clearer evidence emerges about possible links with minstrels. I have no problem with those sides who feel uncomfortable with this and who choose to use another colour, but I also feel able to support those sides who wish to continue blacking up.