Rights delineated in the Constuitution of the United States, apply, in full, only US citizens. - pdq.

Perhaps you could provide a cite for that finding, please?

John, you continue to evade the point. This case isn't about his property rights in any but a peripheral way. It is about the illegal detention of individuals, about the use of excessive force in the protection of his property rights, about assault and battery on a woman. He is guilty in a more proactive way of the same thing you are. And that is the mixing of peripheral facts into the stew of your anger over the issue of illegal immigration. Would you be as angry at this rancher if a bunch of white folks were hiking and littering his property, and he detained them with a gun, had his dog attack them, and threaten them with great bodily harm? And the fact that he has a history and has been fined before tells you that this isn't about his property rights, it is about him using his property rights to carry out a campaign against illegal immigrants.

So I ask you again. In your opinion, is it justifiable to act illegally with illegal immigrants?