Like I said Bobert the study was flawed and not accurate. It did not reflect the true death rate of the pre war era.

You you have not been able to dodge that fact with your gold plated M16 urban legend that was actually a gold plated AK47 that was found in Iraq by US forces.

You you have not been able to dodge the fact that It was other countries that sold the gas ingredients.

You you have not been able to dodge the fact that the vast majority of those "Kurds that "Ahhhhh, were trying to take him out..", were unarmed grannies, babies, women and children that you characterize as some how doing something wrong which justified Saddam's genocide.

Despite your smoke screen of all those urban legends that you claim are facts while you claim other people's facts are not true, your Boss Hogg Soros financed subjective study that you use like a bludgeon to bully other people with is flawed because the baseline was cherry picked from a certain period when Saddam was not exterminating his own people.

Conspiracies and myths always trump facts for liberal Bush haters.

It's like watching a documentary containing facts as compared to sitting down and watching a fictional thriller with a bowl of popcorn. or in your case, a bowl of something else that keeps the Mexican drug lords well financed so they can behead some more innocent people.

The Hopkins researchers chose their "base-line" for pre-invasion Iraq carefully: January 1 2002 to March, 2003. They chose to characterize Ba’athist violence by a period during which the Kurds were sheltered by a U.S.-imposed no-fly zone in the north. They chose to calculate the "pre-war" death rate after the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Shi’a and Marsh Arabs in the South and Kurds in the north has occured.