If there is a difference of opinion about valid argument forms, it requires more than just a statement of disagreement to resolve it.

I do know where to get the technical explanations, but it takes a LOT of typing to take apart compound/complex arguments and demonstrate, point by point, why it is flawed.

   I am not usually making claims attacking or defending various events/beliefs/theories. I merely attempt to show how many of those claims are based on embedded assumptions that are not easily proven, and are largely personal attitudes....on **ALL** sides.

I'm an equal opportunity skeptic.