Fuck me, Teribus, you do seem to have an awful lot of time on your hands!
Ultimately, however, your entire reply is predicated on the truthfulness or otherwise of the US administration (we'll forget the UK - because we were told by Blair that regime change was not an issue; it was solely WMDs).
The evidence' as you claim to call it, is little more than what the administration chooses to publish. Various members of that administration have subsequnetly cried foul on the way that 'evidence' was put forward, while Blix himself - the independent voice on whom you seem to place so much store - was against the invasion.
You believe what you are told. I don't.
And that, old fruit, is that. End of. You can huff and puff and cut and paste all your like, but it won't make you right or me change my mind. So why not go back to a nice jigsaw or the Daily Express picture crossword. I say that in the assumption (given the amount of time you spend on here and the fact that your brain's clearly not firing on all cylinders) that you're retired and that you're not diddling some poor employer out of paid time.