Any one charged with terrorist acts is being charged with crimes, for which there is a real, time-tested process for sorting the evidence, Doug. Your argument seems to preclude using any such process because you are persuaded of their guilt AND their recidivism, without weighing evidence, without due porcess, simply on the strength of blind faith in their accusers.

Obviously such a method is a rampant corruption of any "justice" to which the US claims ti subscribe; but your position must be that such niceties are gainsaid by the fact that these people are terrorists and therefore deserve no justive. THis is a nice circular piece of reasoning.

Don't baffle us with the bullshit of saying we are being irresponsibly reasonable about death-mongering criminal terrorists. You're just propping up your completely extra-legal position by making bogeymen of them.

How about we see what they've done and imprison, execute, or free them according to the bloody FACTS??


A