The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #115883   Message #2602407
Posted By: Amos
01-Apr-09 - 01:49 PM
Thread Name: BS: Popular Views: the Obama Administration
Subject: RE: Popular Views: the Obama Administration
" Conservative leader David Cameron has said US President Barack Obama is "incredibly impressive" after meeting him for the second time in London.

Describing their meeting at the US ambassador's residence as "productive", Mr Cameron said Mr Obama was "extremely personable" and "easy to get on with".

The two first met when the then Senator Obama visited the UK last summer.

Earlier, in Parliament, Mr Cameron said "everyone" wanted G20 leaders to agree reforms on trade and tax reforms.

'Productive'

But he attacked Gordon Brown for leaving the British economy "exposed".

President Obama's meeting with Mr Cameron, which lasted about 30 minutes, came between his high-level one-to-ones with the Russian and Chinese presidents.

        
He is a very easy person to talk with and exchange views with
Cameron on Obama

Obama praises Brown's integrity

Mr Cameron said the private meeting - which covered economic and foreign policy matters - was "excellent".

Asked if Mr Obama was a man he could "do business with" - echoing Margaret Thatcher's famous comment about Mikhail Gorbachev in 1984 - Mr Cameron replied: "He is a very easy person to talk with and exchange views with.

"He is an incredibly impressive politician and leader but he is also an extremely personable human being and someone it is easy to get on with and strike up a relationship with."

There was much "common ground" between the Obama administration and the Conservatives, he added, stressing there was a "wide range of agreement" on many issues. ..."(BBC)




GfS, the executive who had driven GM into stagnation resigned at the request of the Obama administration. By implying or making it a condition of bail-out funding they put him in a position where he would have looked a real ass had he not cooperated.

But bear in mind the man was asking for billions in Federal funds. The government did not fire him. The corporation was not prevented from saving itself, ever. So where is the constiututional compromise, here? Seems to me this is just prudence in the management of taxpayer money.

You may recall that the Bush administrations bailout money went down the rathole with no accountability or stipulations on its use.

Is that your idea of constitutional process?

At no point was anyone in GM prevented from speaking freely, associating freely, bearing arms, or required to house soldiers in their domiciles or incriminate themselves by enforced testimony.

A