Ok, Kent... now we are getting somewhere. You have stated a position, an explication of its premises and a set of suggestions.

I see the logic of certain of them and disagree with 'part' of that logic. I see the value of others, but disagree with their completeness. (The necessary but not sufficient argument)

I have tasks to do today, but I will try to fill in details during breaks.

(I'm sorry that your 'lighter' approach went over my head, but as you say, you hadn't posted enough for me to 'feel' what your tone was. This medium can be pretty unforgiving about subtle references)