Right now gents I don't have the time to give the subject the linguistic clarity it warrants as it'll probably end up in a circular discussion and nitpicking and I have a publisher on my case but when I do, you'll hear it if I can be arsed.

It's déjà vu all over again!

glueman, every time you've raised a specific issue with the 1954 definition I've responded. Every time I've asked you a straight question you've ignored it.
- me, a few hours ago