So the usual flock starts squawking because of one sentence that objects to the practice of name calling and labeling..and now you're back at it???
Your pseudo argument about being a 'civil rights' issue looks more to me, like an avoidance of responsibility, of being kind of parents who got closer to their kids. Here, let the government take care of it, I've got more important things to do. Hogwash! ..Meanwhile, that type of disconnect has bread a myriad of societal ills...and as so far as calling out the name calling, so called 'open minded liberals' ...all I called for was to 'consider the other side'..which if you weren't so trigger happy with your finger pointing denials, you would soon recognize, that what I told you was true, applicable, and far deeper in understanding that you may have even ventured. Try the plunge..try understanding something further than what your perception of the political rhetoric dictates to you, and the rest of the flock.
The only valuable post, following mine, coming your that side was from 'Smedley', which I'd love to respond to, and plan to, as soon as time permits. He, obviously may have a disagreement , or question about what I posted, but he laid it out, in a more honest, less vindictive way. Perhaps something in my post, caused him to consider, and think, maybe hit a resonating node, and he RESPONDED, rather than some of these knee jerk RE-ACTIONS..usually by those who know nothing about what they are talking about, further than 'talking points'!
GfS