Folknacious,they were all good reviews.
guest Squiggle,
If he had replied politely,and allowed the thread,to be discussed[instead of closing it], and explained this ,instead of overreacting and being rude,this would have been clearer.
instead people[as I was] were and still are being misled into thinking this was a review that appeared in froots[it clearly states this article appeared in froots]
why hasnt Ian contacted the reviewer and told him to remove froots name from the article.[he has had 11 months to do so]
I first saw this article on www.session.org
Folknacious is quite wrong,my reason for objecting to the review,was because it was such a hatchet job, at the time I had no idea who james O driscoll was,I just thought it was a disgraceful review.
members of the public should have every right to contact an editor and complain,without being treated with contempt and arrogance.
I was led to believe it appeared in froots[as anyone else would have been].because it stated it appeared in froots