Well, if I have it correct, there is no hunting allowed in national parks... So, other than 2 or 3 people killed in them over a 30 year period, why introduce them??? If you take the square miles of any other area in the country abnd compare the murder rates you'll find that the national parks are just about the safest places in the country... Why???... Danged if I know but I'd venture a guess that the fact that gubs are kept out has some bearing...

So, the national park is kinda like a control group... No guns allowed and very low incidents of vilence... Hmmmmmmm???

What next??? The NRA is going to have its minions hold up the federal budget until kindergarteners are allowed to bring heat into the kindergarten... What then??? Court rooms??? Bars??? No, soccer games!!! Yeah, that would be a good goal for the NRA... Get the soccer fans all packing heat... Make the NRA's gun shop owners lotta money and probably make more folks watch soccer on TV (or attend the games) just hopin' to see a good ol' fashion John Wane western shoot out...

(Sheet fire, Bobert!!! Why not have the NRA hold Obama's Supreme Court noinee hostage until FOX can get guns into mental hospital or prisons and have reality shoot-out reality shows... They would make a load of money...)

Danged... Wish I had thought of that... That is genious!!!

I mean, there really isn't and end to logic (or lack there of) when we strictly interpret the 2nd ammendment and don't bother to look at the 1st half of it...

(But, Bobert, when you ignore the first half of the 2nd ammendment isn't that "loose construction"???)

Well, ahhhhh, yeah... Kinda like the NRA's view of "balance"... Balence meaning that we loosly construct the first half of the 2nd ammendment and strictly construct the second half... That's NRA balance!!!

Screw it... Let's just pass out loaded guns to all babies while they are in the crib and in a few years all these arguments will go away...

Bobert