Nothing worth responding to since my last post...just more misrepresentations by Mr Peekstock, who would be well advised to go back and re-read my posts,   he either lacks any comprehension, or is simply an outright liar.

Amos... I think you were making quite an interesting point, but I have serious problems understanding some of your posts, could you please try some plain English....The grand style may have been OK for Shakespeare, but has really got me scratchin' my head.

Mr Peekstock was being "tongue in cheek", when he is usually "Foot in mouth".