Nice try. No cigar.

I'm not implicitly doing any such thing. More dishonest twisting of my words. No counter arguments have been offered for any of the points made in any of the sources I have provided, and I have been very consistent in pointing this out. But the two articles that the above poster is trying to ignore are important because all of them provide supporting documentation. Ignoring some of the documentation altogether and making ad hominem attacks on the other two as not being supported (because some of the supporting documentation is being ignored) is totally dishonest, and doesn't work.