"You responded with irrelevant data on numbers not voting for the BNP"

Wrong.

I provided evidence of the mojority choosing parties with pluralist platforms.

They chose pluralist policies in preference to racist policies.

"But I don't admit your figures"

They aren't my figures, they are the official EU election results.

It doesn't matter whether you admit them or not, they remain the reality.


"I've made no statements that require evidence, Lox,"

But you have attempted to cast doubt over my assertion as follows.

"there's a big difference between not voting BNP and liking the fact that Britain is a multicultural society."

The evidence so far still supports my assertion.

In a court of law, the casting of reasonable doubt must be supported by evidence or it is disregarded as meaningless.

Do you have anything meaningful to add?

"... and make assumptions about what I think ..."

Can you provide evidence of assumptions I have made about you?


No - I didn't think so.