With my foregoing thoughts in mind, Hardi and I watched several more "Cosmos" episodes last night. I was so sad to see the number of definitive statements made that have, since it was made, become obsolete concepts. I was sad to see the continuing contamination of anti-religious thinking, even as the more generic term "mysticism" was uplifted.

I wish I could take Carl Sagan to lunch and ask him what's up with some of the internal inconsistencies he perpetuated in his own fascination with the wonder of our cosmos. I bet he'd laugh at how crazy science can get, because, like me, his curiosity probably kept him growing as his hair continued to fall out. :~)

I want to know it ALL. I don't want ANY biases in my way. Anytime I spot one holding me back I root it out as quick as I can.


That makes a Question Number Three: Does curiosity drive you like that, too, or are you more "fact"-driven, or both?

3. More curiosity-driven than fact-driven


~Susan