"She envisions herself as the female Reagan.   It's certainly true there's the same minimal grasp of any issue.   But there the parallel stops."

               Does that mean she would not sign an amensty bill that would drive California--and much of the rest of the country--into insolvency 23 years later. And she would not initiate a peace time military build up that would run up so much federal debt that it wouldn't be paid off for another two decades, and that she wouldn't declare 1983--or any other year--to be the "Year of the Bible," and that she wouldn't be stupid enough to marry someone who thought you could "Just Say No To Drugs," and the drugs would all go away, and that she wouldn't make a deal with Iran to provide missles to shoot at Iraq to provide money for the purpose of flooding Los Angeles with crack cocain to provide a diversion as to what you are really doing, and that she wouldn't team up with somebody as grotesque as Margaret Thatcher to promote something as stupid as "supply-side-economics."



               She sounds like my kind of girl!