I still stand by my 01:48 PM post. I do know such people and the fact that I disagree with them does not mean that I feel free to ignore their rights. If there is to be a line between what is OK to do and what is not, then the line has to be drawn based on generic arguments so as to have absolutely undisputed validity. And it has to be tested against extreme conditions to see if it passes.

OK, of course in the real world things are imperfect, and we pass laws as best we can, and then try to implement them as best we can. But let's not kid ourselves that they represent "absolute truth".