1. There is a third option for MBS George. She could admit that she was wrong and rejoin decent society. Incidentally, the plight of the single mother is not universally pitied. Many, from the same side of the looking glass as the BNP assert that single women flock in droves to have children in order to be able to live a life of feckless luxury on benefits and without working (or without declaredly working). I have close awareness of the falsity of this picture.

2. The issue of whether to identify and target any such viper on our bosom is one for the site owner and the mods. As we are sometimes told, it is not a democracy.

3. Bill: there are two options. The alternatives are these: either you have not thought this through or you are a saboteur seeking to divide this community (yet further) by inference for reasons related to the central topic of this thread. The night is young, the bottle is full, and there is nothing on TV, so I will explain.


The cloning of mudcat persona started shortly after the foundation of FaF. Indeed some who were more prominent in FaF were targetted first. FaF had its fakebook group. That was what it was. People ther referred to the discussion here of FaF and people here referred to the fakebook group. There seem to have been BNP twerps on fakebook for ages. It is a sad reflection on humanity. The FaF group will have led them here.

Similarly, even BNP twerps can use a search engine. Searching for BNP ("oh, look, ma, I'm on the internet") will have found them the adverse references here. Some sought to enter debate and were trounced (or, in their sub-human language, "pwned").

That is likely to have driven them to seek some playground level revenge - but, politically more importantly, since the BNP sought to arrogate English folk music song and ritual to itself, it will have driven them to create Aunt Sallies - the evil twins of the 'catters who trounced them in debate here. Those evil twins could be called upon in the surreal world of fakebook, and beyond, to discredit opponents of the BNP - and FaF. It makes sense, in their essentially undemocratic form of debate to proceed as they have done.

But what of your great point? Do the BNPers know us? Well, given that they can work a search engine it is easy for them to find ALL posts here, by name and reference. They don't need the mudcat search engine or its member only features to do that. It is part of the NP ethos that the white race cannot get jobs because teh ethnic minorities are simultanwoulsly claiming benefits and taking all the jobs, so the hard-core BNPers must be at home all day with nothng to do but watch daytime TV or trawl the internet (because, save for the reported convictions for benefit fraud, of course they would not stoop to workig while claiming) So your point falls.

The fact that they do not in fact "know" us is established by the recent rantings of Sam Hudson (or was it Leah Green?) - who failed wholly to understand (why am I not surprised) a post of mine here and produced on their wall a pile of lunatic, infantile, pathetic, Walter Mitty (or to them, since they cannot read classic literature, its vocabulary being beyond them) "Chuck") gibberish about us fantasising about our 007 secret agents.

So, Bill, if you have not done your homework, can you really be here to make the point you say you are making? If not, then what? QED.