I suppose the Dunoon observer could be asked where they got their information from.

then again.

It does cite two sources very clearly and clarifies its sources credibility very clearly.

It also refers to previous public statements made by its first source, ACHA.

ACHA are the sites landlords and they have made clear that they have not evicted their tenants, but are doing up their home and paying 25% of the refurbishment costs to repair damage caused by fire and vandalism.

The article does not express an opinion, but simply reports two pieces of information.

1. ACHA's synopsis of what they are doing with the site nd why..

2. The results of a survey conducted by 3 local authourities into anti traveller violence.


But even though "I cannot go into any further detail than I have provided already" Ake still knows best.



Ake, your loyalty to your opinions in the face of a constant stream of contradictory evidence on numerous subjects shows great determination, but ultimately marks you out for all the wrong reasons.

Apart from a wittier turn of phrase and slightly more complex rationale, your position is no different to that of the BNP.

Your refusal to accept the evidence provided or to provide your own evidence is also consistent with the way they do things.

You might not be a BNP supporter but they love reading your posts here as on other threads and they certainly see you as being on their side because the upshot of your arguments is the same as theirs.

Witch-hunt my arse.

That's just playing the victim.

So you exercise your free speech and blame eastern europeans for unemployment and tell us how Moslems think they're bettter than us and don't want to integrate cos your goan mate thinks so, and tell us that the tinkers down the lane are all criminals and druggies.

And I'l exercise my free speech and point out what a load of utter tripe you talk.