Here's an excerpt fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz

..."In his opinion, Judge Land opined on Ms. Taitz: "Her modus operandi is to use military officers as parties and have them allege that they should not be required to follow deployment orders because President Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President". The judge cited evidence the plaintiff submitted, including an online AOL poll, that the plaintiff believed was evidence that President Obama was not a citizen, and therefore she should not have to deploy to Iraq

Judge Land expressed astonishment at Ms. Taitz' apparent misunderstanding of American judicial fundamentals: "Thus, Plaintiff's counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to "prove his innocence" to "charges" that are based upon conjecture and speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly "protect and preserve" those very principles...

Following a petition for rehearing of his original dismissal order, Judge Land sanctioned Taitz for frivolous litigation and ordered her to show cause why she should not be fined $10,000 for abuse of judicial process."