That is exactly my point Keith

On a subject about which you clearly know nothing, you go to the website of an anti-immigration website and clip a sentence that sounds good to your prejudices and your viewpoint.

You told people that "The government changed the rules in June 1997 to permit marriage to be used as a means of immigration."

When that statement is completely incorrect and you only had to go to a more factual and impartial article by a third-party adviser on the same website - that is to say you only needed (as I did) actually to read the related briefing notes - to discover that your information was a lie.

I accused you of going out on the internet looking for lies to bring back and propagate to others.

That accusation stands proven.