Look I've been really patient but I don't think Keith is worth the effort.

Does anyone else think that I am being impatient with him?

Does anyone I think I need to explain in more detail why a life long member and a present fellow of the 'Galton Society' (renamed in 1988 from the 'Eugenics Society' whose founder was ) can be accurately described as an Eugenicist?

Does anyone else think I need to explain, rather than point Keith to an encyclopaedia, that Eugenics is the belief that human evolution can and should be directed by controlling 'less worthy' populations and races?

Does anyone else think that a group founded by a Eugenicist should have its opinions (not 'facts, just its opinions) questioned somewhat, rather than just taken as some kind of truth?

Does anyone think Keith will ever join in a conversation about present day immigration issues and concerns? I see no evidence of this being likely.