I posted the ENTIRE article in the opening post. Nothing was missing or edited out. My post of 09:34 was an error on my part ( fat fingers). My point was that the information available o me left me wondering
from post 22 Oct 09 - 12:54 PM
"Prosecutors in West Virginia have dismissed Williams' new claim,"
THAT is what bothered me. Not even worth looking into?
THAT is why I put it up here. If it is racist, then I will object to ANY post here that involve more than one race, regardless of why they are posted, as being ( equally) racist.
BillD,
When YOU ask the people YOU agree with the same questions, THEN you have the right to a better answer than the one I gave. Since YOU insist on requiring those you disagree with to comply to a different standard than those you agree with are held to, I felt it appropriate to treat YOU ( and others, such as Amos) in the same manner.
Capish?
I looked yesterday and couldn't find an answer, Bruce; but I didn't understand that the first message in the thread was the one that was causing problems. Maybe it was an unjustified deletion, or maybe it just didn't "take." And I guess I have to say that since your posting is so prolific and so frequently and blatantly violates the one-screen limit on copy-pastes, I might be reluctant to spend much time investigating - but I did post the entire article in the first message. By the way, if you want to discuss something, perhaps it might be an idea to introduce the discussion with something a bit more literate than simply "WTF." -Joe Offer-