"Not talking about drunk drivers" because you are thinking that any drinker who is under the 80 mg limit is not drunk??? Granted that he's not legally drunk under your present law, but he will be if the proposed law passes. But come on, now, stop splitting hairs -- a driver who drinks is a drunk driver. I'll say it once again: buzzed driving IS drunk driving. Do you understand what "buzzed" means???? It means "drunk but under the blood-alcohol level that would cause one to be prosecuted as being legally drunk."

Here we go again with the "you seem to like telling people what to do" bullcrap. I already said that you can take or leave the advice I'm giving (and that I'm free to give in a discussion forum). If you didn't want to hear what people have to say to you on this subject, why did you start this thread and repeatedly ask people what they think?

And what's up with your description of the speed at which you drive? You're the one who brought up the subject of speeding drivers, and now you're acting as if I'm accusing you of speeding. Why so defensive???