I don't see where you have been accused of anything but prejudging the undercover people while demanding that ACORN should not be prejudged and that matters.

Pre-judging would be if I said we know they falsified the tape, so we don't need to see any more evidence. It's not a pre-judgment to say that we can't determine whether or not the accusations by the people who made the videos are true until we see the rest of the evidence. Which is what I am and have been saying. The only pre-judging that is being done is by you and those who think we can make a judgment about the guilt of the ACORN workers in the videos before we have seen all of the evidence.


Please explain "negative consent", and show us the evidence that they used this tactic.