Hi gang....just got back and I know you've been fretting, so what is there to answer.....hmmm abuse.....oh yes some foul language....more abuse.....bullshit from Don n' Lox (didn't I see that duo play together one time?)....Oh my god! TIA is a woman...now that's a surprise......I woulda never guessed..honest! and I fancy myself as a bit of an expert.

Well TIA, as I am always the gentleman, I will attempt to answer your question.

If a vaccine against aids were to be developed, I would be pleased that lives were being saved, but the fact that we had developed a vaccine, would not make homosexual practice safe or healthy; we would simply be controlling the RESULTS of some the unhealthy physical aspects of homosexuality, and ignoring others like associated psychiatric problems etc.

BTW....I have never "Opposed homosexual relationships", that is for homosexuals themselves to come to terms with.
If they wish to live a lifestyle withall its associated risks that is their own business.

Right from the beginning, I have opposed the promotion of homosexuality by politicians and activists, as a safe, healthy and normal lifestyle. This includes the legalisation of homosexual marriage and the fostering of young children by male homosexuals.


Now, when is someone going to answer my question regarding homosexuality, incest, and civil rights???

Its rather like saying, if prostitutes were guaranteed free from STD's prostitution would be acceptable