So you admit, SO'P, that he was 'inspirational'. Then why so much negativity about him? He could be a very awkward, contentious man to deal with, as many discovered — see the post of mine of last 30 Aug which I mention above: but how does your "inspirational" fit in with your "molehill"? You just are not being consistent. And don't say you are driven to such negative comments as a counterblast to Jim's [perceived by you] overpraise: I persist in seeing you as more intelligent and sensible than to react in such a fashion.