Ake made a statement some time back, claiming that two men make "an infinitely more dangerous sexual grouping than a man and a woman."

When someone makes a statement like this, it is expected by any rational person that they have a reason or some kind of data to back it up. I have asked Ake the same question several times now:

What, intrinsically, makes two men "an infinitely more dangerous sexual grouping than a man and a woman?"

Yet, Ake simply blows right by it, ignoring the question. It seems that he considers me and a couple of other people not worth answering. And why might that be? Because we have the nasty habit of zeroing right it on the foundations of why he thinks the way he does, and he knows that if he tries to defend his position, it will reveal that he can't give a reasonable sounding answer that won't make his bigotry and prejudice obvious for all to see.

Even him!

Don Firth