"The traditional performers' view is one I would seek out first because it comes from nearer the source of our music - not to say I would automatically agree with it, but I would certainly give it more credence than has been given by the revival as a whole Our traditional singers, by and large, have been treated as sources for our material and nothing else; this is why we know so little about the tradition IMO"
I agree, but with the proviso,that the more I liked or respected the singers singing,the more credence I would give to their view point.
so while I would listen and consider the viewpoint of say Gordon Hall[were he with us],I would probably put more value on Sarah Makems comments[were she here], because I prefer her singing.
however I would base my judgement on[my perception] of what was good,rather than label,so I would value [say] Bob Blakes comments[revival mistaken for traditional]above Gordon Hall[traditional], because I think he was a better singer.
there are also some revival singers [Sean Cannon MacColl,Lloyd and some others]whose opinions on singing Ballads,I would consider wortrhy of serious consideration.