I read Pauls post, and despite the clumsy wording I understood the meaning of it.

The content of his post was new to this thread and added an original and profound dimension to the issue.

It counters in very insightful philosophical terms the idea that a homosexual represents the end of an evolutionary line.

It demonstrates how homosexuals, despite not procreating, may have a significant impact on the evolution of their species.

In some cases, as in the example provided by paul, they may have a greater evolutionary significance than many heterosexuals.

This is a difficult concept to encapsulate in a short post, yet despite pauls hastee, he conveyed it well enough for me to understand.


Akes admission that he doesn't understand it and his subsequent barking and tail wagging says nothing of my intellect and plenty about Ake's.


Akes new tactic is to argue as follows

"I don't understand therefore you're stupid"

This is because every other argument he has presented has been destroyed, and he has been exposed for being a fuckwit.


DUH!!!