How can you say you think someone a bigot, but not be able to cite one bit of bigotry?
That is, er, bigotry.
looking back over the last couple of pages, you actually said that focused interventions were going on and were valuable, alongside basic health education including AIDS awarenes for all.
How do we disagree?
You also said you would be happy for students to be told about ALL the relevant risks as long as it was not implied that lower risk meant no risk.
No argument from me.
I think that the only serious difference between us is that you believe a heterosexual epidemic is starting that may be comparable to the situation for MSMs. I have found no evidence for that, and I note that de Cock thinks it unlikely, which I take as strong evidence to the contrary.