thank you, Lox, for explaining that. As I said weeks ago, as Kevin de Cock says, it is all about sexual networks and how tight they are. That is the only reason gay men in the west are disproportionately represented. It appeared in that group, it can't readily break out and in such a tight and closed network, the infection and disease is hot-housed.

That straight, white people have managed a 500pc increase from such a ow starting pool of carriers in a big and wide open transmission network is appalling. Something caring needs to be done about it. Like a general education program.

It also shows that there must, on the terms of Ake, GfS et al, be something quite appalling about contemporary heterosexual practice. If of course they are consistent and not just homophobic bigots.

Keith, I am glad that you are finally coming to the realisation that the 'liberal' argument here is proven to be justified. It does nothing to reduce the utter contempt in which I hold you for your wrong-minded and malicious efforts to prove something entirely different.

Please tell me why you do this, if you are not a bigot? What is your point in all this?