Not new? Thirteen posts in two days, twelve on one topic? Of course you could be a regular, posting under a changed pseudonym, which believe is an abuse of the forum.

But your points:

(1) Opinion polls: these are from the MORI website, and refer to February and March 2003.

Q Would you support or oppose British troops joining any American-led military action against Iraq in each of the following circumstances?

                Feb    March
Support         24         26         +2
Oppose                67         63         -4
Don't know         10         11         +1

Certainly a rise in support for war, from over two- thirds against to almost two- thirds against.

Parliament: place- seeking cowards whipped to death. The decent ones who resigned were conspicuous by their small number.

The press: do us a favour. The Guardian certainly wasn't in favour, the Murdoch press including the Chunderer do what they are told, and the redtops

Dr Kelly: opposed the "45 minute" claim. We don't know his thoughts in detail, and he wasn't spared to tell us his full reasons. He was certainly convinced afterwards that the invasion had been wrong; and fear of what he knew was trhe reason he was either murdered or at best hounded to death. And rather mysteriously we aren't to know any more for 70 years.

So perhaps, when you've come out as to who you "really" are, you'll also tell us why you need to make ridiculous assertions in support of the insupportable?